Exorcist III (1990)

exorcist3_poster

  • Writer: William Peter Blatty
  • Director: William Peter Blatty
  • Starring: George C. Scott, Brad Dourif, Jason Miller, Ed Flanders
  • Medium: SHUDDER (Streaming)

Synopsis

Based on William Peter Blatty’s book, Legion. A supposed exorcism took place in the Georgetown area of Washington, DC. Around the same time, the notorious Gemini Killer was put to death. 15 years later, killings are happening again, using the same modus operandi as the Gemini Killer. The only problem is that the press were leaked incorrect information about what the Gemini did (this allowed the cops to ferret out all the crackpots who claimed to be the killer), and these new killings are displaying the real trademarks of the Gemini. The victims, however, are all connected to the supposed exorcism of Regan McNeil. On top of all that, there is a man in isolation at the hospital who claims to be the Gemini Killer. He is never allowed to leave his room, and he actually appears to be former priest, Damian Karras, who helped perform the exorcism and fell to his death down those famous flight of stairs. It’s up to Detective Kinderman to figure out what is going on.

exorcist3_friends
Ed Flanders and George C. Scott taking over as Father Dyer and Detective Kinderman

Review

First off, this is a review of the original theatrical version. There is a director’s cut that has been recently released to Blu Ray by Scream Factory. Although I am dying to do so, I have not yet purchased or viewed this edition. Also, I have read the book this is based on. It’s been awhile, but I absolutely loved the book, which I thought was a much better story than the movie. The director’s cut supposedly follows the book a bit more.

This film is definitely a worthy successor to one of the most famous horror films of all time. That alone is not an easy task. It’s fiction, but I would love to re-read the original novel, The Exorcist, to see relationships built (possibly even the film adaptation). My only critique is that the film starts with Father Dyer (the young piano-playing priest in the original) saying he needs to comfort his friend, Detective Kinderman (the detective from the original), because he gets sad every year on this day because it is the anniversary of Father Karras’ death. Detective Kinderman says the same story about Father Dyer. They both make it seem like they are consoling the other, when both need it. The critique is that I believe Kinderman met Karras during the investigation in the original story. Karras dies at the end. In this film, it is said that Kinderman and Karras were basically best friends, but I don’t know if they really had the time to develop that much of a friendship prior to Karras’ death. Minor thing. Having them as close friends adds to the tension and drama, so I let it slide.

There are plenty of freaky scenes in this movie. More jump scares, though, than the religious freakiness of the original. Even though you know a scare is coming, it doesn’t stop you from jumping in your seat when it finally occurs.

The tone is different from the original movie, which I think makes for a great sequel. Instead of seeing the same events play out for a second time, it uses the events that happened in the original to drive the continuing story of the same characters in a believable way. The story itself may not be believable (depending on your belief system), but you can see how the same characters would be pulled back into a connected storyline. It is an interesting story and almost, for a time, a bit of a whodonit, followed by a howdhedoit.

Top notch acting. George C. Scott seems to lose grip on his anger pretty quickly (maybe too quickly), but I thought he gave a wonderful performance. I bought into his drama. He was a likable hard ass.  It’s been 15 years, so people change. But, I thought I remembered Kinderman being a bit more mellow in his demeanor during the original. Ed Flanders’ Father Dyer still has that happy, showman attitude. He is a great character, and Flanders plays him to perfection. Despite her character being a bitch, Nancy Fish plays Nurse Allerton with this wonderfully subtle caring and nice demeanor, even she outwardly appears pissed all the time. All the other bit players (the old patients, the fellow cops, the doctors and nurses) do a fabulous job as well. Then, there is Jason Miller, who portrays the body of Damian Karras, who may have been possessed by the spirit of the Gemini Killer as life left him at the bottom of the staircase. His screen time is somewhat limited, but seeing the familiar face was a treat, and he delivers a great performance. When I first saw the film and even watching it 25 years later, I am floored with Brad Dourif’s performance as the essence of the Gemini. He became one of my favorite actors because of this film. Despite being in a straitjacket, he emotes showmanship. His range goes from soothing to rage in an instant, and it is quite a sight to behold.

exorcist3_jump
The ultimate jump scare

When I first saw the movie, I thought the ending seemed a little out of place. The mostly talky piece suddenly devolves into an exorcism with crazy visuals. I was interested in reading the book to see if there was more to this ending because I felt like I was missing something, like maybe they had to cut the scene or the build-up to the scene because it kind of seemed like it came out of nowhere. After reading the book and seeing that this ending was nowhere to be found, it made the book that much better because I was on board with the provided ending. I guess the book ending matches what was originally filmed as well, but the studio wanted a big exorcism in the finale, so Blatty lost out. I look forward to seeing how the ending plays out in the director’s cut.

Film Rating: 8.5 Wonderfull Lifes out of 10 | Despite the lackluster The Heretic and the couple versions of the fourth installment being let-downs, it is nice to see that a blockbuster, near perfect original film can still have such a worthy sequel.

Night of the Living Dead (1990)

  • notld90_poster
  • Writers: John A. Russo, George A. Romero
  • Director: Tom Savini
  • Starring: Tony Todd, Patricia Tallman, Tom Towles, Bill Moseley
  • Medium: SHUDDER (Streaming)

 

Synopsis

A re-telling of the 1968 classic. The dead suddenly start walking, and they are attacking and then feeding on any humans they can. The one benefit is that the zombies are slow and weak. The biggest problem is that their numbers keep growing larger.

Barbara and her brother are at a cemetery when they are attacked. Barbara escapes, but her brother does not make it out alive. Barbara finds an empty house for shelter and is soon joined by Ben, who is in the same boat. Eventually, they find out a couple families are holed up in the cellar. They must battle the zombies and each other to try to make it through the night.

notld90_ben
Tony Todd as Ben, trying to fight back a zombie

 

Review

I thought I remembered renting this back in the day shortly after it hit home video and don’t remember really thinking much one way or the other. I liked the original but just glossed over this one. Throughout the years, Night of the Living Dead (1968) grew on me more and more, and the tension is just amazing. I wanted to give the remake another shot and finally found it available through SHUDDER. I was doing my best to watch this movie on its own merits and stop comparing it to the original, but, really, can anyone get the source material purged from their memory before watching a remake?

With make-up effects maestro Tom Savini helming this film from the director’s chair, I expected some great effects and was not disappointed. With the film being in color, the effects could not be hidden in the shadows of black-and-white film. The zombies really seemed to be highlighted in this movie and with good reason. The blood, the decay – all done very well.

The story also takes some interesting turns thanks to some revisions by screenwriter (and original director) George A. Romero. He took the original script by himself and John A. Russo and fashioned it for a new generation. Whereas the original had a black lead (really unheard of in horror at the time), the focus shifts a little more towards Barbara this time, although Ben is still the driving force to try to save the group. Although the role of Ben was not written for a specific race, racial tensions were still high in 1968, and the film could be seen as a fight for racial equality. This film, with Barbara a much stronger character and hero, it could be seen as the feminist fight. It’s the only redeeming factor for a scene between her and Cooper towards the end of the film.

The acting is done well, with Bill Moseley doing a spot-on re-creation of the Johnnie character, and future Candyman (1992), Tony Todd, portrays the Ben character perfectly. The other bit-players do their parts well, although Tom Towles sometimes goes a little overboard portraying Harry Cooper. The big difference in character is Barbara. Instead of a mostly catatonic character, she becomes a strong lead and is believably portrayed by Patricia Tallman. I believe she could’ve kicked my ass.

notld90_barbara
Barbara kicking ass this time around

 

Maybe it’s my own maturation, but I think this film has aged very well, and I’m not sure why I wasn’t impressed my first time around.

Film Rating: 7.5 don’t say zombies out of 10 | I don’t see this version replacing the original in my rotation, but I don’t see waiting another 20+ years to view it again, either.